The Kaduna State Ministry of Human Services and Social Development and the House of Assembly have engaged themselves in a tango over the ministry’s capital budget for 2021.
While the ministry claims that the House removed votes for its capital projects in the approved 2021 budget, the legislature states that it did not do any such thing, but only worked on what the Executive presented to the House,
The ministry had proposed to spend N878.5 million on various intervention projects in the incoming year.
They include that for Vesico Vaginal Fistula intervention, N20 million; child protection services N83.2 million, and upgrading of a children and women centre, N23.5 million.
Others are support and assistance for the completion of 23 community self-help projects at N24.4 million; establishment of Kaduna State Youth Parliament, N21.9 million and intervention on Sexual Assault Referral Centres, N18.8 million.
There is also the N476.6 million being 1 per cent Internally Generated Revenue earmarked for Social Protection Programmes.
The commissioner in the ministry, Hajiya Hafsat Baba, who confirmed the removal of the capital vote, said that she did not know why the House moved the ministry’s capital budget to other ministries, departments and agencies that had no mandate on the intervention projects.
“I really do not know why the Assembly did that, but I learned that the members of the Assembly have said that I am disrespecting them. This is not true.
“There was also the issue with the 774,000 Federal Government Public Works jobs, which I was accused of not giving the members additional slots, more than what I was directed to give them.
“The committee for the programme which I chair, allocated 30 slots each to the Principal Officers of the House while each member got 25 slots,’’ she said.
The commissioner explained that the mandate of the ministry was to look after children, women, and youths and that removing its budget and spreading same to other agencies was irrational.
“I think they need to have a rethink and look at the issues objectively. If they have any grudge against me as an individual, it should not affect the good people of Kaduna State, particularly the vulnerable groups the ministry is catering for,’’ she added.
Chairman, House Committee on Appropriation, Malam Ahmed Mohammed, however, refuted the commissioner’s claims.
Mohammed explained that what the Assembly did was to either increase or reduce a budgetary allocation and not move entire budgets to other Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).
“We will not deny any ministry the needed funds to execute its capital projects; that is not our job. The budget that was handed over to us by the Executive is what we worked on.
“There were no capital allocation for the ministry in the budget document that was handed over to us and we worked with what we were given. Besides, she was not even at the budget defence for us to look at her budget,’’ he said.
Mohammed also denied knowledge of any disagreement between the legislators and the commissioner over slots for Federal Government’s 774,000 Public Works programme.
He however, accused the commissioner of being disrespectful to members of Assembly.
