Nigeria’s armed forces have dismissed suggestions that they should take over from President Muhammadu Buhari, who is facing mounting pressure over the country’s worsening insecurity.
According to an AFP report obtained from Yahoo-news It was not the first time Nigeria’s armed forces have issued a statement backing Buhari, but the latest has come after weeks of criticism of the 78-year-old former general’s failures to stem the protracted security crisis.
From a jihadist insurgency in the northeast to herder-farmer clashes in the centre, banditry in the northwest and Fulani herdsmen tensions in the south ,Buhari’s armed forces appear to be struggling to curb insecurity.
In a statement late Monday,according to AFP, the armed forces said they would continue to “fully” support the government, remain politically neutral and protect Nigeria’s democracy.
“Let it be stated categorically that the Armed Forces of Nigeria remain fully committed to the present administration and all associated democratic institutions,” army spokesman Onyema Nwachukwu said in the statement.
“We shall continue to remain apolitical, subordinate to the civil authority, firmly loyal to the President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, President Muhammadu Buhari and the 1999 Constitution as amended,” it said.
Last week, lawmakers had urged Buhari to declare a nationwide state of emergency after a month of almost daily attacks, kidnappings and killings across Africa’s most populous country.
The mililtary statement referred specifically to comments made by Robert Clarke, a prominent lawyer and social commentator.
He had said the country was on the brink of collapse and suggested the political leadership hand power to the military so that the security forces could be restructured.
Opposition figures like Bukola Saraki and Nobel winner and playwright Wole Soyinka have also urged Buhari to seek external help or resign.
In a statement Tuesday, Buhari’s office said “some disgruntled religious and past political leaders” were planning to “eventually throw the country into a tailspin, which would compel a forceful and undemocratic change of leadership.”